Skip to main content

The U.S. government may delay EV requirements — what that means for car buyers

Automakers are concerned about their ability to meet aggressive emissions targets. 

Charging a Ford F-150 Lightning EV with a Level 2 wall charger in a garage.
Ford / Ford

Political winds of change are buffeting the transition of automobile power trains from fossil fuels to electricity despite studies showing the benefits of switching to EVs, including saving tens of thousands of lives and billions of dollars. Improving the quality of the Earth’s atmosphere would seem to be a cause everyone would support. According to a recent report in The New York Times, however, the Biden Administration may soften the early impact of proposed Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tailpipe emissions standards for model years 2027 to 2032 and hasten the transition to EVs.

A person standing at the right rear side of a VW ID.4 charging the EV's battery with an NACS charger.
VW / VW

Why slowing tailpipe emissions level limits matter

The current administration sent a clear message in April 2023 with two EPA proposals that would significantly hasten the adoption of all-electric cars and heavy trucks. The effect of the EPA proposals would be that by 2032, 67% of new passenger cars and light-duty trucks and 25% of new heavy trucks sold in the U.S. would be zero-emissions vehicles. The standards proposal includes specific emissions levels from 2027 to 2032 but does not stipulate EV sales percentages.

The as-yet-unspecified and unconfirmed lower compliance standards would apply to the first years but hold 67% for cars and light-duty trucks and 25% for heavy-duty trucks by 2032. In other words, if the still-vague changes were implemented, the transition process could start slower but accelerate faster than initially planned in the last two years.

Better quality air isn’t an all-or-nothing measure. Intentionally slowing progress in cleaning the atmosphere sounds like a bad move on the surface. If the mandated changes were impossible or wildly impractical, then adjusting the allowable emissions levels could be strategically wise because failure in the early years could derail the entire program.

ev charging in sunny weather
Blue Planet Studio / Shutterstock

The forces driving the transition slowdown

Several factors are at play in the reported efforts to moderate the emissions level thresholds. Automakers, including GM, Ford, VW, and others, have been sending mixed messages for the last eight or nine months about their relative focus on EVs, including battery and infrastructure investments. As they face transitioning production lines, automakers are concerned about their ability to meet aggressive targets.

Labor unions are reportedly concerned about workers losing jobs working on internal combustion engine (ICE) production lines, especially if their members won’t retrain to work in EV factories. With the increased robotics on production lines and fewer systems in battery electric vehicles compared to ICEVs, both factors that suggest potential reductions in personnel, unions may also be concerned that the number of jobs gained won’t equal the more significant number of jobs lost.

Politics is also active, mainly because of divisive political stances regarding climate change and EVs. If the Biden administration believes it needs to moderate its current position on EVs to increase President Biden’s chances of re-election, as some report, that step back could be a decisive consideration.

Dealers, too, may push back on the EPA plan if the immediate-post-pandemic rush to buy EVs has waned and the dealers fear that easier-to-sell and more profitable ICEs would become scarce.

And finally, consumers have been signaling with their dollars. When the EPA proposals were floated last April, dealers were largely still selling every EV they could get their hands on. Now dealers report previously ordered EVs sitting on their lots along with inventory cars. EV unit sales continue to grow, but more customers are pushing back on EV price premiums. This situation worsens with changing subsidy programs and high auto-loan interest rates.

Three Tesla Superchargers beside a low-roofed building.
James Qube/Pixabay / Pixabay

What slowing emissions standards mean to car buyers

If you’ve been considering buying an EV, there have been encouraging signals in dropping EV prices in the last six to nine months. If the pressure on automakers to transition to EVs is lessened, the price slide will likely slow down as production lines pick up for ICEs and the BEV supply weakens. Major manufacturers, including Tesla, Ford, and VW, have indicated their next focus is on smaller, much more affordable GEN 2 all-electric cars.

Instead of envisioning that your first BEV will be a full-size 3-row do-it-all SUV like the Hyundai EV9, perhaps it might be more practical to think about buying a hybrid for your next large vehicle and possibly a small car such as the Fiat 500e for daily driving and local errands.

Editors' Recommendations

Bruce Brown
Digital Trends Contributing Editor Bruce Brown is a member of the Smart Homes and Cars teams. He also writes technology news…
Toyota chairman boldly claims electric cars will never dominate, says hybrids are the better option
Hybrids are better than EVs says Toyota Chairman
ChargePoint Home Flex EV charging station charging a white Tesla in a garage.

 

It's not breaking news that EVs have been all the rage over the last decade. Elon Musk and Tesla dominate news wires, while companies like Kia and Hyundai are tripping over themselves trying to get newer and better electric options to showroom floors. Beyond that, we've seen plenty of reports that the electric revolution is better for our health, as well as the planet, and is an inevitable change we simply have to learn to embrace... or is it? But, with EV sales beginning to stagnate at the end of 2023, suddenly, we are seeing something many didn't expect, and according to Akio Toyoda, chairman of Toyota, consumers are "finally seeing reality."

Read more
Chicago, Tesla show how climate change is beating EVs
Charging EVS at home may be the best cold weather practice.
Telsa

Tesla Cybertruck snow performance isn't the only climate-related EV problem. Frigid Arctic temperatures caused havoc among Chicago-area EV owners in mid-January. During extended hours of sub-zero temperatures, EV batteries couldn't hold their charge, and charging took much longer than usual. Charging times grew, and waiting times multiplied at charger locations overwhelmed by the weather.

TV news pieces showed Tesla supercharger stations with long lines of cars waiting to charge and people pushing Teslas with depleted batteries to parking spaces. Tesla is an easy target, but the very low temperatures affect all EVs with Lithium-ion batteries.

Read more
Mercedes Benz teases the electric G Class: Here is what you can expect
Get ready for a G class EV
Rendering of side profile of Mercedes-Benz EQG in front of blue skies.

Over the past few years, Mercedes-Benz has unveiled electric vehicle models such as the EQS, EQB, and EQE models. As is tradition, you also have the option to choose Mercedes-Maybach and AMG electric models to suit your taste. The AMG EQE SUV starts at $109,300, while the Mercedes-Maybach EQS SUV will cost you around $200,000.

However, the all-electric G Wagon, dubbed the EQG, is missing from the action. The last time we caught a glimpse of it was back in 2021 as a concept car. Well, it’s expected to be produced later this year, and Mercedes-Benz teased it at the 2024 CES technology show in Las Vegas. Here is what you can expect: 

Read more